Best Practice Advice AC2-09: Difference between revisions
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions== | ==Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions== | ||
The computational domain for Sandia D Flame should extend far enough | |||
from the nozzle outlet to capture at least the region of maximum | |||
temperature, i.e. ''x/D'' ≥ 50. The numerical tests performed have shown that | |||
in order to limit the CPU time the computational domain can be made | |||
divergent in the downstream direction, and the lateral extent used in | |||
the current calculations (5.5''D'' and 18.3''D'' at the inlet and outlet plane | |||
respectively), is sufficient not to influence the flame structure by | |||
the lateral boundary conditions. The coflow as in experimental | |||
conditions should be introduced at the inlet and at the lateral | |||
boundaries. | |||
==Discretisation and Grid Resolution== | ==Discretisation and Grid Resolution== | ||
<!--{{Demo_AC_BPA4}}--> | <!--{{Demo_AC_BPA4}}--> | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 30 April 2011
SANDIA Flame D
Application Challenge AC2-09 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024
Best Practice Advice
Key Fluid Physics
The non-premixed Sandia D flame is an example of a flame in the flamelet regime in which the Kolmogorov scale is significantly larger than the scales characteristic for the combustion process. In this not demanding test case the models based on flamelet assumption should lead to good agreement with experimental data as was shown in the Evaluation section, especially in the region of developed flame. However, more discrepancies were observed in the near field were only mixing of fuel and oxidizer is considered.
Application Uncertainties
The flow field in the near field is certainly influenced by inlet conditions. The mean velocity profile and fluctuating component were chosen according to the experimental data. However, in the unsteady LES calculations the fluctuations were simulated by white noise. This means that the fluctuations characteristic for developed turbulent flow were not reproduced at the inlet and this could influence the mixing features in the near field. It is well known that white noise provides a fluctuating signal with a very short time scale which is then smoothed at a short distance from the inlet plane. However, it seems that due to very low inlet turbulence level the further results in the flame region are only weakly influenced by these near field results as both models analyzed led to reasonable results.
Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions
The computational domain for Sandia D Flame should extend far enough from the nozzle outlet to capture at least the region of maximum temperature, i.e. x/D ≥ 50. The numerical tests performed have shown that in order to limit the CPU time the computational domain can be made divergent in the downstream direction, and the lateral extent used in the current calculations (5.5D and 18.3D at the inlet and outlet plane respectively), is sufficient not to influence the flame structure by the lateral boundary conditions. The coflow as in experimental conditions should be introduced at the inlet and at the lateral boundaries.
Discretisation and Grid Resolution
Physical Modelling
Recommendations for Future Work
Contributed by: Andrzej Boguslawski — Technical University of Częstochowa
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024