UFR 4-20 Test Case: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
The geometry of the reduced-scale enclosure studied in this UFR was cubical with edge L = 0.3 m. A linear ventilation inlet slot was present at the top with a height h<sub>inlet</sub>/L = 0.1 and a width w<sub>inlet</sub>/L = 1, and a linear ventilation outlet was located at the bottom of the opposing wall (h<sub>outlet</sub>/L = 0.0167)
The geometry of the reduced-scale enclosure studied in this UFR was cubical with edge L = 0.3 m. A linear ventilation inlet slot was present at the top with a height h<sub>inlet</sub>/L = 0.1 and a width w<sub>inlet</sub>/L = 1, and a linear ventilation outlet was located at the bottom of the opposing wall (h<sub>outlet</sub>/L = 0.0167)
(see [[UFR_4-20_Description#figure1|Fig.&nbsp;1]]).
(see [[UFR_4-20_Description#figure1|Fig.&nbsp;1]]).
The walls had a thickness d (d/L = 8/30). The slot Reynolds number was defined as Re = U0hinlet/?, with U0 the bulk inlet velocity, hinlet the slot height (see Fig. 1a) and ? the kinematic viscosity at room temperature (? 20°C). For this study two Re-values were included: Re = 1,000 and Re = 2,500, which resulted in mixing ventilation driven by a transitional wall jet, including the typical large recirculation cell, jet detachment from the top surface and Kelvin-Helmholtz-type instabilities in the shear layer of the wall jet (van Hooff et al. 2012a). No temperature differences were included (isothermal case); i.e. no buoyancy effects were present.  
The walls had a thickness d (d/L = 8/30). The slot Reynolds number was defined as
Re&nbsp;=&nbsp;U<sub>0</sub>h<sub>inlet</sub>/&nu;, with U<sub>0</sub> the bulk inlet velocity, hinlet the slot height (see Fig. 1a) and &nbsp; the kinematic viscosity at room temperature
(&asymp;&nbsp;20°C). For this study two Re-values were included: Re&nbsp;=&nbsp;1,000 and
Re&nbsp;=&nbsp;2,500, which resulted in mixing ventilation driven by a transitional wall jet, including the typical large recirculation cell, jet detachment from the top surface and Kelvin-Helmholtz-type instabilities in the shear layer of the wall jet (van Hooff et al. 2012a). No temperature differences were included (isothermal case); i.e. no buoyancy effects were present.  


<br/>
<br/>

Revision as of 14:20, 5 December 2017

Mixing ventilation flow in an enclosure driven by a transitional wall jet

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 4-20

Test Case Studies

Brief description of the study test case

The geometry of the reduced-scale enclosure studied in this UFR was cubical with edge L = 0.3 m. A linear ventilation inlet slot was present at the top with a height hinlet/L = 0.1 and a width winlet/L = 1, and a linear ventilation outlet was located at the bottom of the opposing wall (houtlet/L = 0.0167) (see Fig. 1). The walls had a thickness d (d/L = 8/30). The slot Reynolds number was defined as Re = U0hinlet/ν, with U0 the bulk inlet velocity, hinlet the slot height (see Fig. 1a) and   the kinematic viscosity at room temperature (≈ 20°C). For this study two Re-values were included: Re = 1,000 and Re = 2,500, which resulted in mixing ventilation driven by a transitional wall jet, including the typical large recirculation cell, jet detachment from the top surface and Kelvin-Helmholtz-type instabilities in the shear layer of the wall jet (van Hooff et al. 2012a). No temperature differences were included (isothermal case); i.e. no buoyancy effects were present.




Contributed by: T. van Hooff — Eindhoven University of Technology

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024