UFR 3-34 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Underlying Flow Regime 3-34 === | === Underlying Flow Regime 3-34 === | ||
= Evaluation = | = Evaluation = | ||
==Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments== | |||
In this section we first present major results of RANS computations of the considered flow | |||
performed with different turbulence models [7] and their comparison with the experimental data | |||
(sub-section 6.1). Then, in sub-section 6.2, results are presented of the scale-resolving | |||
simulations (enhanced RANS-LES methods [8], [9] and WRLES [6]). This sub-section begins | |||
with a comparison of flow visualizations from different simulations, which visually display | |||
turbulence resolving capabilities of the approaches used. Then, a comparison with the | |||
experimental data is shown for the main body of these simulations. | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 6 March 2018
Semi-Confined Flows
Underlying Flow Regime 3-34
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments
In this section we first present major results of RANS computations of the considered flow performed with different turbulence models [7] and their comparison with the experimental data (sub-section 6.1). Then, in sub-section 6.2, results are presented of the scale-resolving simulations (enhanced RANS-LES methods [8], [9] and WRLES [6]). This sub-section begins with a comparison of flow visualizations from different simulations, which visually display turbulence resolving capabilities of the approaches used. Then, a comparison with the experimental data is shown for the main body of these simulations.
Contributed by: E. Guseva, M. Strelets — Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024