UFR 3-30 Best Practice Advice: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{UFRHeader
{{UFRHeader
|area=3
|area=3
Line 49: Line 48:


The series of predictions for the broad range of Reynolds numbers
The series of predictions for the broad range of Reynolds numbers
considered here shed new light on the flow. In particular, the existence
considered here shed new light on the flow (Breuer et al. 2009).
of a small recirculation at the foot of the windward face of the hill
In particular, the existence of a small recirculation at the foot of the windward face of the hill
was confirmed for Re=10,595 but also exists for 200 < Re < 10,595.
was confirmed for Re=10,595 but also exists for 200 < Re < 10,595.
Besides, a tiny recirculation on the hill crest which has not been
Besides, a tiny recirculation on the hill crest which has not been

Revision as of 10:27, 9 December 2009

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

2D Periodic Hill

Underlying Flow Regime 3-30


Best Practice Advice

Best Practice Advice for the UFR

Key Physics

The prediction of flow separation from curved surfaces and subsequent reattachment is complicated by several phenomena including irregular movement of the separation and reattachment lines in space and time, strong interactions with the outer flow, transition from a boundary layer type of flow to a separated shear layer with failure of the law-of-the wall and standard model assumptions for either attached flows or free shear layers. The improvement of flow prediction by Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) simulation or large-eddy simulation (LES) in such flows is dependent on reliable data of generic test cases including the main features of the respective flow phenomena. The flow over periodically arranged hills in a channel as proposed by Mellen et al. (2000) has been used as benchmark test case since it represents well-defined boundary conditions, can be computed at affordable costs and nevertheless inherits all the features of a flow separating from a curved surface and reattaching on a flat plate.

A detailed analysis was carried out in Fröhlich et al. (2005) including the evaluation of the budgets for all Reynolds stress components, anisotropy measures, and spectra. The emphasis was on elucidating the turbulence mechanisms associated with separation, recirculation and acceleration. The statistical data were supported by investigations on the structural features of the flow. Based on that interesting observations such as the very high level of spanwise velocity fluctuations in the post-reattachment zone on the windward hill side were explained. This phenomenon revealed to be a result of the `splatting' of large-scale eddies originating from the shear layer and convected downstream towards the windward slope. That explains why RANS simulations even when applying second-moment closures can not capture the flow field accurately.

The series of predictions for the broad range of Reynolds numbers considered here shed new light on the flow (Breuer et al. 2009). In particular, the existence of a small recirculation at the foot of the windward face of the hill was confirmed for Re=10,595 but also exists for 200 < Re < 10,595. Besides, a tiny recirculation on the hill crest which has not been discussed before was found which solely exists at the highest Re. This was possible due to a new LES prediction with increased resolution supported by a series of DNS at lower Reynolds numbers. These data also allowed to investigate the behavior of the separation and reattachment length as a function of the Reynolds number. The separation length past the hill crest was found to continuously decrease with increasing Re until it reaches at minimum at Re = 5600 and slightly increases again for Re = 10,595. Even more exciting is the non-monotonous behavior of the reattachment length, which with one exception also decreases with increasing Re but shows a local minimum at Re = 1400. Interestingly, a small counterrotating flow structure with positive averaged wall shear stress was detected within the main recirculation region at the falling edge of the hill between x/h = 0.6 and 0.8. This phenomenon is exclusively visible at this Reynolds number and provides an explanation for the variations of the reattachment length.

Based on the analysis of the Reynolds stresses and the behavior of the flow in the anisotropy-invariant map, it is obvious that the development of the shear layer past the hill crest is delayed and thus shifted downstream at Re = 700 compared to Re = 10,595. If this downstream shift is taken into consideration, similar states of turbulence can be found at both limiting Reynolds numbers with more distinctive extrema observed for the high-Re case. The similarity is especially pronounced for the `splatting' phenomenon of large-scale eddies originating from the shear layer and convected downstream towards the windward slope as described in Fröhlich et al. (2005). In this flow region the spanwise velocity fluctuations show nearly the same peak values and distribution for all Re studied. Nevertheless, in the remaining domain clear trends in the distributions of the mean velocities, Reynolds stresses, anisotropies and the wall shear stresses were found. As mentioned above that led for example to the observation of the tiny recirculation bubble at the hill crest at Re = 10,595.

Furthermore, the length scales appearing in the turbulent flow field at varying Re and the dynamic behavior of the flow were investigated taking even smaller Reynolds number into account. At Re = 100 the flow is found to be steady and two-dimensional. The situation changes completely at for which a three-dimensional instantaneous and chaotic flow field is observed. The corresponding spectrum at this and any higher Reynolds number considered comprises a fully continuous spectrum which extends towards higher frequencies with increasing $Re$. Three main flow structures can be detected already in the lowest-Re case. These are streaky structures close to the upper wall, streamwise vortices close to the concave wall in front of the second hill, and vortical structures induced by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability of the free shear layer.

Numerical Modelling

Physical Modelling

Application Uncertainties

Recommendations for further work

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


Contributed by: Christoph Rapp — Technische Universitat Munchen

© copyright ERCOFTAC 2009