UFR 2-11 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments == | == Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments == | ||
A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS, | A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS, | ||
first reported by Shur et al. [22], was observed in the extensive cross-validation | first reported by Shur ''et al.'' [‌[[UFR_2-11_References#22|22]]], | ||
exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [4]. | was observed in the extensive cross-validation | ||
exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [‌[[UFR_2-11_References#4|4]]]. | |||
Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved | Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved | ||
by DES and URANS within this work. | by DES and URANS within this work. | ||
Revision as of 09:32, 7 September 2011
High Reynolds Number Flow around Airfoil in Deep Stall
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-11
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments
A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS,
first reported by Shur et al. [22],
was observed in the extensive cross-validation
exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [4].
Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved
by DES and URANS within this work.
Contributed by: Charles Mockett; Misha Strelets — CFD Software GmbH and Technische Universitaet Berlin; New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and Saint-Petersburg State University
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024