UFR 2-11 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | <!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | ||
== Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments == | == Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments == | ||
A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS, | |||
first reported by Shur et al. [22], was observed in the extensive cross-validation | |||
exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [4]. | |||
Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved | |||
by DES and URANS within this work. | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 7 September 2011
High Reynolds Number Flow around Airfoil in Deep Stall
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-11
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments
A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS,
first reported by Shur et al. [22], was observed in the extensive cross-validation
exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [4].
Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved
by DES and URANS within this work.
Contributed by: Charles Mockett; Misha Strelets — CFD Software GmbH and Technische Universitaet Berlin; New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and Saint-Petersburg State University
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024