Template:ACTestData

From KBwiki
Revision as of 15:49, 17 February 2011 by Dave.Ellacott (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This Template is used for generating an AC Test Data page. Use substitution not transclusion for embedding it into your new page.

  • articleTitle - the title of the article
  • area - the AC area number (1,2,3...)
  • number - the article number (01,02,03...)
  • authors - the list of authors, each seperated by a semi-colon
  • organisation - the contributing organisation


{{{articleTitle}}}

[[AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Front Page]]

[[Description_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Description]]

[[Test Data_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Test Data]]

[[CFD Simulations_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}| CFD Simulations]]

[[Evaluation_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Evaluation]]

[[Best Practice Advice_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Best Practice Advice]]

{{{areaTitle}}}

Application Challenge AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}

Overview of Tests

Provide an overview of the scope of the tests and the experimental approach used. This should cover the main aspects of the experimental set up and the measurement techniques used (LDV, hot wire, pressure tappings etc).

If a scaled model was used, due consideration should be given to model scaling issues. Any model simplifications/idealisations of the AC geometry should also be described (e.g. 2D instead of 3D, omission of detailed features, simplification of complex features, i.e. porous media, use of roughness elements). If important details of the geometry representation are uncertain then the impact of these uncertainties on the DOAPs should be discussed, including possible ways for managing their effect.

Sampling/averaging times, and their effect on quantities measured and on DOAPs in particular, should also be discussed.

Identify all experimental tests for which data is available. In order to minimise the number of test descriptions, it is suggested that, as far as possible, experimental data from various runs or experimental conditions be grouped together under a single test case, if variations to experimental setup can be clearly defined in terms of:

  • the governing non-dimensional parameters (GNDPs defined above in 1.5), or
  • problem definition parameters (PDPs), such as wind direction, angle of attack, aspect ratio, source rate etc.

It is left to the discretion of each author to decide the most appropriate way for structuring and summarising the test case results, within the broad framework suggested above.

A summary table for all tests should be included as shown below in Table EXP-A. The variables measured in each test should also be clearly identified, (e.g. UVW, k, concentration, etc). A distinction should be drawn between detailed local data (e.g. p(x,y,z)) and data relating to DOAPs which are likely to be global/summary parameters (e.g. coefficient of lift, CL).

All available detailed data should be stored in separate electronic datafiles (according to guidelines set out by the Knowledge Base team at the University of Surrey). These should be summarised as shown below in Table EXP-B, with links to each of the datafiles.


Name GNDPs PDPs (problem definition parameters) MPs (measured parameters)
Re Fr Wind direction Source rate (kg/s) Release density(kg/m3) Detailed data DOAPs
Exp 1 (dense gas dispersion) 0, 30, 45, 90, 180
Re Wind direction Building geometry Detailed data DOAPs
Exp 2 (passive gas releases) 0, 30, 45 A, B, C, D
Table EXP-A Summary description of all test cases


MP1 MP2 MP3 DOAPs, or other miscellaneous data
EXP 1 exp11.dat exp13.dat
EXP 2 exp21.dat exp22.dat exp23.dat exp24.dat
Table EXP-B Summary description of all measured parameters and available datafiles



TEST CASE EXP1

Description of Experiment

Quantify the parameters that define this particular set of experiments (GNDPs and PDPs). Describe which parameters were measured (MPs), where in space and time (state units in SI). Conventions for presenting data in each of the datafiles should be simple, and clearly stated.

Boundary Data

Specify in detail the conditions pertaining at all boundaries on all dependent variables (data need not be quantified here if included as a dataset). The boundaries should include inflows, symmetry surfaces, walls, far-fields, free surfaces and outflows. If the walls are rough, roughness heights should be specified. Are the turbulent stresses and length scale measured at inflows? If not give advice on how these should be set up. If any boundary data is uncertain then discuss the sensitivity of DOAPs to this uncertainty. Is there any reasonable way of managing this uncertainty if the sensitivity is appreciable?

Measurement Errors

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

Measured Data

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

References

  • Reference 1
  • Reference 2

TEST CASE EXP2

Description of Experiment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

Boundary Data

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

Measurement Errors

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

Measured Data

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam vulputate, nibh quis dictum cursus, mi felis commodo elit, ac posuere mi quam et dolor. Integer libero ante, posuere quis pharetra in, lobortis non turpis. Proin accumsan, arcu ac facilisis volutpat, purus magna pellentesque mi, vitae porttitor turpis elit eget nisl. Nullam mauris felis, volutpat at vehicula quis, pretium at magna. Maecenas tristique erat dolor, sit amet congue eros. Pellentesque commodo neque consectetur orci sodales bibendum. Praesent interdum urna a mauris cursus et eleifend leo auctor. Aliquam vel eros ac diam accumsan dignissim. In mollis erat eget massa dictum faucibus. Etiam a erat eu erat blandit accumsan. Vivamus ac justo quis ante dignissim cursus vitae sit amet sapien. Nam urna tortor, molestie et porta eu, iaculis at ipsum. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse eu libero ac odio ornare vehicula. Maecenas luctus aliquam lectus sit amet accumsan.

References

  • Reference 1
  • Reference 2




Contributed by: {{{authors}}} — {{{organisation}}}

[[AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Front Page]]

[[Description_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Description]]

[[Test Data_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Test Data]]

[[CFD Simulations_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}| CFD Simulations]]

[[Evaluation_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Evaluation]]

[[Best Practice Advice_AC{{{area}}}-{{{number}}}|Best Practice Advice]]


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024