Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • [[Main Page]]
    2 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 19:33, 29 August 2009
  • [[Category:QNET-CFD Main]]
    2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 15:04, 29 August 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Category:QNET-CFD Main]]
    36 bytes (4 words) - 19:48, 29 August 2009
  • = WikiSysop Main Page =
    181 bytes (26 words) - 14:24, 19 March 2009
  • File:UFR3-32 geometry experiment.pdf
    Describes the geometry of the experiment. Recalls the main parameters.
    (178 KB) - 15:13, 28 August 2013
  • This is the discussion main page. '''Main Discussion Points'''
    1 KB (212 words) - 15:15, 19 February 2008
  • Give a brief overview of the EXP in question. Describe the main characteristics of the type of flow. ...are the underlying flow physics which characterise this test case and the main
    902 bytes (117 words) - 14:08, 13 March 2023
  • This paragraph describes the main items for today's editorial.
    198 bytes (26 words) - 18:07, 23 March 2009
  • Give a brief overview of the UFR in question. Describe the main
    370 bytes (59 words) - 09:51, 17 February 2011
  • ...France in Chatou, France. A high Reynolds number flow is maintained in the main pipe while very small incoming mass flow rates are imposed in the auxiliary ...l power in the dead leg is directly affected by the Reynolds number in the main pipe and by geometric details of the junction, whereas the influence of the
    3 KB (494 words) - 11:37, 14 January 2022
  • <!--** QNET-CFD-Main|Main Category-->
    2 KB (221 words) - 13:25, 13 March 2023
  • ...here in this wiki seem to be larger than the 2% for slat/main and 2.3% for main/flap, as informed in the AGARD 303 reference.
    1 KB (187 words) - 15:07, 11 February 2017
  • ...France in Chatou, France. A high Reynolds number flow is maintained in the main pipe while very small incoming mass flow rates are imposed in the auxiliary ...l power in the dead leg is directly affected by the Reynolds number in the main pipe and by geometric details of the junction, whereas the influence of the
    5 KB (768 words) - 16:00, 11 February 2017
  • ...t for this test case. Give a brief overview of the test case. Describe the main characteristics of the flow. In particular, what are the underlying flow ph
    472 bytes (79 words) - 11:42, 4 September 2020
  • The CFD results have been used to calculate the pressure drops between the main branch (leg 1) and each of the two secondary branches (legs 2 and 3) for ea Figure 8 – Coarse mesh at main branch inlet
    3 KB (370 words) - 16:12, 11 February 2017
  • ...ction. In addition, the CFD simulation predicts a greater spreading of the main element wake at this location than indicated by the experiment. ...d that the CFD code tends to under predict the mixing between the slat and main element wakes.
    3 KB (528 words) - 15:08, 11 February 2017
  • **[[QNET-CFD-Main|Main Category]]
    3 KB (317 words) - 10:56, 17 October 2019
  • ...e there is also a second bubble at the top wall. In the turbulent case the main recirculation zone is smaller and a secondary bubble appears inside this re The main features to be compared in this test case are the general pattern of the st
    4 KB (578 words) - 11:49, 14 January 2022
  • ...l power in the dead leg is directly affected by the Reynolds number in the main pipe and by geometric details of the junction, whereas the influence of the A high Reynolds number developed turbulent flow is maintained in the main pipe while very small incoming mass flow rates are imposed in the auxiliary
    6 KB (983 words) - 16:02, 11 February 2017
  • ...ce on the order of the numerical scheme which is necessary to resolve the main flow features (controlling the DOAPs) on practical grids.
    762 bytes (119 words) - 12:36, 18 February 2011
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)