Gold:UFR3-05 instruct: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
A Fortran program for generating a single-block two-dimensional grid,
A Fortran program for generating a single-block two-dimensional grid,
together with sufficient documentation, can be found in files
together with sufficient documentation, can be found in files
[[Media:UFR3-05_gridaxibump.f.dat|gridaxibump.f]]  and  [[Gold:UFR3-05_gridaxibump|gridaxibump]]
[[Media:UFR3-05_gridaxibump.f.dat|'''gridaxibump.f''']]  and  [[Gold:UFR3-05_gridaxibump|'''gridaxibump''']]
For an axisymmetric calculation the 2D plane should be rotated as
For an axisymmetric calculation the 2D plane should be rotated as
mentioned at the top of [[Media:UFR3-05_gridaxibump.f.dat|gridaxibump.f]]
mentioned at the top of [[Media:UFR3-05_gridaxibump.f.dat|'''gridaxibump.f''']]


===Boundary Conditions===
===Boundary Conditions===
Line 30: Line 30:
Notes about the dimension of the computational domain:
Notes about the dimension of the computational domain:


* XMAX set at ''x/c''=3.5 from bump trailing edge. This is sufficiently far
* XMAX set at ''x/c''=3.5 from bump trailing edge. This is sufficiently far from the zone of interest; here ''c'' is the bump chord length.
from the zone of interest; here ''c'' is the bump chord length.


* YMAX set at 4.5*''c'' ensures that there is no shock reflection.
* YMAX set at 4.5*''c'' ensures that there is no shock reflection. There is, however, a fluctuation of ~1% of free-stream Mach No. on the top boundary. This is found to have negligible effect on the critical flow features such as CP.
There is, however, a fluctuation of ~1% of free-stream Mach No.
on the top boundary. This is found to have negligible effect on the critical flow features such as CP.


* XMIN set at 4.0*c upstream from the bump leading edge. After several trials, we found that if we specify a plug velocity profile at this location, the corresponding profile at ''x/c''=-0.25 matches with experiment reasonably well. However, other inlet profiles with different XMIN location may be possible.


 
* All of above observations are based on high-''Re'' ''k – ε'' calculations.
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>3. XMIN set at 4.0*c upstream from the bump leading edge.
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>After several trials, we found that if we specify
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>a plug velocity profile at this location, the corresponding
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>profile at x/c=-0.25 matches with experiment reasonably well.
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>However, other inlet profiles with different XMIN location
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>may be possible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>4. All of above observations are based on high-Re k-e calculations.
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>


===Experimental Data===
===Experimental Data===


The experimental data at different axial locations are given in files
The experimental data at different axial locations are given in files
[[Media:UFR3-05_Experiment-CP.dat|'''Experiment-CP.dat''']] and
[[Media:UFR3-05_Experiment-UV.dat|'''Experiment-UV.dat''']].


Experiment-CP.txt  and  Experiment-UV.txt


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>Wall static Pressure (CP) is calculated as
Wall static Pressure (CP) is calculated as


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>
''CP = (p&nbsp;-&nbsp;p<sub>0</sub>)/0.5&rho;<sub>0</sub>u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>''


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>CP = (p-p0)/0.5*rho0*u0**2
''p<sub>0</sub>'', ''&rho;<sub>0</sub>'' and ''u<sub>0</sub>'' are the free-stream quantities


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>
X: Normalised distance along the flow. (= ''x/c'', where ''c'' is the bump chord length. X=1.0 corresponds to the bump trailing edge.


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>p0, rho0 and u0 are the free-stream quantities
Y: Vertical distance from the bottom solid wall (= ''y/c'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>
U: Normalised streamwise velocity (= ''u/u<sub>0</sub>'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>X: Normalised distance along the flow. (=x/c, where c is the
V: Normalised transverse velocity (= ''v/u<sub>0</sub>'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 2">            </span>bump chord length. X=1.0 corresponds to the bump trailing edge.
UU: Normalised streamwise component of normal stress (= ''u&prime;u&prime;/u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>Y: Vertical distance from the bottom solid wall (=y/c)
VV: Normalised transverse component of normal stress (= ''v&prime;v&prime;/u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>U: Normalised streamwise velocity (=u/u0)
MUV: Normalised Reynolds shear stress (= ''-u&prime;v&prime;/u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>'')


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>V: Normalised transverse velocity (=v/u0)
TKE: Turbulent Kinetic Energy (= ''k/u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>'')
where, ''k = 0.5(u&prime;<sup>2</sup>+v&prime;<sup>2</sup>+w&prime;<sup>2</sup>)''


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>UU: Normalised streamwise component of normal stress (= u'u'/u0**2)
Since only ''u&nbsp;&prime;'' and ''v&nbsp;&prime;'' were measured, the third component was
calculated from :


<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">     </span>
<math>{w^\prime}^2=0.5({u^\prime}^2+{v^\prime}^2)</math>
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>VV: Normalised transverse component of normal stress (= v'v’/u0**2)
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>MUV: Normalised Reynolds shear stress (= -u'v'/uo**2)
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>TKE: Turbulent Kinetic Energy (=k/u0**2)
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>where, k = 0.5*(u'**2+v'**2+w'**2)
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>Since only u' and v' were measured, the third component was
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>calculated from :
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>
 
<span style="mso-tab-count: 1">      </span>w'**2=0.5*(u'**2+v'**2)


NOTE: Please note that at some locations, data for all the above
NOTE: Please note that at some locations, data for all the above
Line 116: Line 82:
The data derived from CFD calculations using a number of different turbulence models can be found in:
The data derived from CFD calculations using a number of different turbulence models can be found in:


[../U3-05des.htm#CFD_Data CFD Files]
[[Gold:UFR_3-05_Description#The_VoTMATA_data|'''CFD Files''']]


The interpretation of the tabulated data is the same as that above for the experimental data with the following additions.
The interpretation of the tabulated data is the same as that above for the experimental data with the following additions.


CF =<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>(wall shear stress)/(0.5*rho0*u0**2)
CF = (wall shear stress)/''(0.5&rho;<sub>0</sub>u<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)''
 
NUT = <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>(Turbulent Viscosity)/(rho*u0*c)


The final column of data is the normalised second scale determining variable (e.g e or w etc.)
NUT = (Turbulent Viscosity)/(''&rho;u<sub>0</sub>c'')


</div>
The final column of data is the normalised second scale determining variable (e.g ''e'' or ''w'' etc.)




{{UFR|front=UFR 3-05|description=UFR 3-05 Description|references=UFR 3-05 References|testcase=UFR 3-05 Test Case|evaluation=UFR 3-05 Evaluation|qualityreview=UFR 3-05 Quality Review|bestpractice=UFR 3-05 Best Practice Advice|relatedACs=UFR 3-05 Related ACs}}
{{UFR|front=UFR 3-05|description=UFR 3-05 Description|references=UFR 3-05 References|testcase=UFR 3-05 Test Case|evaluation=UFR 3-05 Evaluation|qualityreview=UFR 3-05 Quality Review|bestpractice=UFR 3-05 Best Practice Advice|relatedACs=UFR 3-05 Related ACs}}

Latest revision as of 15:17, 11 April 2010

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References



Instructions for transonic axisymmetric bump flow calculation

Grid

A Fortran program for generating a single-block two-dimensional grid, together with sufficient documentation, can be found in files gridaxibump.f and gridaxibump For an axisymmetric calculation the 2D plane should be rotated as mentioned at the top of gridaxibump.f

Boundary Conditions

Boundary conditions for the variables are as follows:

X=XMIN: inflow - Uniform inlet Mach Number of 0.875 for axial component and zero value for others

X=XMAX: outflow - zero longitudinal gradient

Y=YMIN: no-slip wall

Y=YMAX: Euler wall


Notes about the dimension of the computational domain:

  • XMAX set at x/c=3.5 from bump trailing edge. This is sufficiently far from the zone of interest; here c is the bump chord length.
  • YMAX set at 4.5*c ensures that there is no shock reflection. There is, however, a fluctuation of ~1% of free-stream Mach No. on the top boundary. This is found to have negligible effect on the critical flow features such as CP.
  • XMIN set at 4.0*c upstream from the bump leading edge. After several trials, we found that if we specify a plug velocity profile at this location, the corresponding profile at x/c=-0.25 matches with experiment reasonably well. However, other inlet profiles with different XMIN location may be possible.
  • All of above observations are based on high-Re k – ε calculations.

Experimental Data

The experimental data at different axial locations are given in files Experiment-CP.dat and Experiment-UV.dat.


Wall static Pressure (CP) is calculated as

CP = (p - p0)/0.5ρ0u02

p0, ρ0 and u0 are the free-stream quantities

X: Normalised distance along the flow. (= x/c, where c is the bump chord length. X=1.0 corresponds to the bump trailing edge.

Y: Vertical distance from the bottom solid wall (= y/c)

U: Normalised streamwise velocity (= u/u0)

V: Normalised transverse velocity (= v/u0)

UU: Normalised streamwise component of normal stress (= u′u′/u02)

VV: Normalised transverse component of normal stress (= v′v′/u02)

MUV: Normalised Reynolds shear stress (= -u′v′/u02)

TKE: Turbulent Kinetic Energy (= k/u02) where, k = 0.5(u′2+v′2+w′2)

Since only u ′ and v ′ were measured, the third component was calculated from :

NOTE: Please note that at some locations, data for all the above variables were not always available. This may be recognized in the data sets below by the appearance of a '999' which does not represent a real value.

CFD Calculations

The data derived from CFD calculations using a number of different turbulence models can be found in:

CFD Files

The interpretation of the tabulated data is the same as that above for the experimental data with the following additions.

CF = (wall shear stress)/(0.5ρ0u02)

NUT = (Turbulent Viscosity)/(ρu0c)

The final column of data is the normalised second scale determining variable (e.g e or w etc.)


Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References