Best Practice Advice AC7-02: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


==Application Uncertainties==
==Application Uncertainties==
List  any  uncertainties  which  make  a  high  fidelity  CFD  model  difficult  to  assemble.  Typical examples might include:
*a gas leakage between two components which is difficult to resolve on practical meshes, andeven if it is resolved, the leakage flow conditions may not be known.
*flow conditions at inlet to the AC (or indeed other boundaries) which may be complex and not precisely known.
*fine details of the geometry are imprecise.
Briefly discuss the sensitivity of the DOAP predictions to these uncertainties and their impact on the  BPA.  In  particular,  can  clear,  unequivocal  BPA  be  given  or  is  it  necessary  to  introduce appropriate caveats.


==Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions==
==Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions==

Revision as of 13:40, 14 May 2020

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Airflow in the human upper airways

Application Challenge AC7-02   © copyright ERCOFTAC 2020

Best Practice Advice

Key Fluid Physics

Briefly describe the key fluid physics/flow regimes which exert an influence on the DOAPs. Ideally this should draw together into a coherent picture the associated UFR descriptions together with any important interactions which are AC specific. Mention the UFRs associated with this AC that you have considered in drafting your best practice advice. Access the Knowledge Base to find the UFRs associated with your AC.

Application Uncertainties

List any uncertainties which make a high fidelity CFD model difficult to assemble. Typical examples might include:

  • a gas leakage between two components which is difficult to resolve on practical meshes, andeven if it is resolved, the leakage flow conditions may not be known.
  • flow conditions at inlet to the AC (or indeed other boundaries) which may be complex and not precisely known.
  • fine details of the geometry are imprecise.

Briefly discuss the sensitivity of the DOAP predictions to these uncertainties and their impact on the BPA. In particular, can clear, unequivocal BPA be given or is it necessary to introduce appropriate caveats.

Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions

Discretisation and Grid Resolution

Physical Modelling

Recommendations for Future Work

Acknowledgements

References




Contributed by: S. C. Kassinosa — 
aDepartment of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2020