Best Practice Advice AC2-10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Application Challenge AC2-10''' © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}} | '''Application Challenge AC2-10''' © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}} | ||
=Best Practice Advice= | =Best Practice Advice= | ||
==Key Fluid Physics== | |||
==Application Uncertainties, Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions== | |||
==Physical Modeling, Numerics and Recommendations== | |||
==Recommendations for future work== | |||
==References== | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 9 October 2018
Internal combustion engine flows for motored operation
Application Challenge AC2-10 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024
Best Practice Advice
Key Fluid Physics
Application Uncertainties, Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions
Physical Modeling, Numerics and Recommendations
Recommendations for future work
References
Contributed by: Carl Philip Ding,Rene Honza, Elias Baum, Andreas Dreizler — Fachgebiet Reaktive Strömungen und Messtechnik (RSM),Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Brian Peterson — School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Contributed by: Chao He , Wibke Leudesdorff, Guido Kuenne, Benjamin Böhm, Amsini Sadiki, Johannes Janicka — Fachgebiet Energie und Kraftwerkstechnik (EKT), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Peter Janas, Andreas Kempf — Institut für Verbrennung und Gasdynamik (IVG), Lehrstuhl für Fluiddynamik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Contributed by: Stefan Buhl, Christian Hasse — Fachgebiet Simulation reaktiver Thermo-Fluid Systeme (STFS), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany; former: Professur Numerische Thermofluiddynamik (NTFD), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2018