Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (moved UFR 2-11 to Lib:UFR 2-11)
No edit summary
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=High Reynolds Number Flow around Airfoil in Deep Stall=
{{UFRHeader
{{UFRHeader
|area=2
|area=2
Line 9: Line 7:
=== Underlying Flow Regime 2-11 ===
=== Underlying Flow Regime 2-11 ===
= Abstract =
= Abstract =
 
The flow around airfoils at high (beyond stall) angles of attack  is  a
{{Demo_UFR_Guidance}}
fundamental  problem  of  external  aerodynamics.  Conventional  RANS
turbulence models are not only incapable of predicting  a  steady  mean
flow for this UFR with acceptable accuracy  but  also  "by  definition"
cannot capture its essential  features  (inherent  3-dimensionalty  and
unsteadiness) which are of significant interest for aero-acoustics  and
aero-elasticity applications.  These  circumstances  have  defined  the
primary choice of specific test case, namely the flow around a NACA0021
airfoil at 60° angle of attack, as the only one for which  experimental
data on unsteady as well as mean  flow  characteristics  are  available
[‌[[UFR_2-11_References#27|27]], [[UFR_2-11_References#28|28]]] and for which a wide spectrum of computations  with  different
CFD codes has been carried out in  the  framework  of  the  EU  DESider
Project [‌[[UFR_2-11_References#5|5]]]. The very similar case of the thinner NACA0012  airfoil  in
deep stall is employed as a related secondary test case from which past
experience  allows  additional  best  practice  advice  (BPA)  to  be
extracted. Two principal purposes are envisaged for this UFR  case  and
BPA. Firstly, to document the experience gained  with  respect  to  the
most suitable  computational  techniques,  in  order  to  advise  users
considering the practical computation of similar flows.  Secondly,  the
case is envisaged  as  an  ideal  verification  case  for  testing  new
developments or implementations of turbulence-resolving models, such as
hybrid RANS-LES approaches.
<br/>
<br/>
----
----
{{ACContribs
{{ACContribs
|authors=Charles Mockett, Misha Strelets
|authors=Charles Mockett; Michael Strelets
|organisation=CFD Software GmbH
|organisation=CFD Software GmbH and Technische Universitaet Berlin; New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University
}}
}}
{{UFRHeader
{{UFRHeader
Line 24: Line 42:


© copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}}
© copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}}
[[Category:Flow Around Bodies|High Reynolds Number Flow around Airfoil in Deep Stall]]

Revision as of 10:58, 19 October 2011

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Flows Around Bodies

Underlying Flow Regime 2-11

Abstract

The flow around airfoils at high (beyond stall) angles of attack is a fundamental problem of external aerodynamics. Conventional RANS turbulence models are not only incapable of predicting a steady mean flow for this UFR with acceptable accuracy but also "by definition" cannot capture its essential features (inherent 3-dimensionalty and unsteadiness) which are of significant interest for aero-acoustics and aero-elasticity applications. These circumstances have defined the primary choice of specific test case, namely the flow around a NACA0021 airfoil at 60° angle of attack, as the only one for which experimental data on unsteady as well as mean flow characteristics are available [‌27, 28] and for which a wide spectrum of computations with different CFD codes has been carried out in the framework of the EU DESider Project [‌5]. The very similar case of the thinner NACA0012 airfoil in deep stall is employed as a related secondary test case from which past experience allows additional best practice advice (BPA) to be extracted. Two principal purposes are envisaged for this UFR case and BPA. Firstly, to document the experience gained with respect to the most suitable computational techniques, in order to advise users considering the practical computation of similar flows. Secondly, the case is envisaged as an ideal verification case for testing new developments or implementations of turbulence-resolving models, such as hybrid RANS-LES approaches.



Contributed by: Charles Mockett; Michael Strelets — CFD Software GmbH and Technische Universitaet Berlin; New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024