Description AC2-10: Difference between revisions
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Application Challenge AC2-10''' © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}} | '''Application Challenge AC2-10''' © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}} | ||
==Abbreviations== | ==Abbreviations== | ||
<div id="table1"></div> | |||
{|align="center" border=1 cellpadding=5 width=700px | |||
|+ style="caption-side:top" align="center"|'''Table 1:''' Mesh resolution study details for the high-Reynolds number and low-Reynolds number models | |||
|- | |||
!Mesh!!Strut!!Guide vane!!Runner!!Draft tube!!Total | |||
|- | |||
|High-Reynolds Coarse||3 × 10<sup>5</sup>||7 × 10<sup>5</sup> | |||
|7.6 × 10<sup>5</sup>||1 × 10<sup>6</sup>||2.76 × 10<sup>6</sup> | |||
|- | |||
|High-Reynolds Fine||3 × 10<sup>5</sup>||8 × 10<sup>5</sup> | |||
|1.1 × 10<sup>6</sup>||2.85 × 10<sup>6</sup>||5.05 × 10<sup>6</sup> | |||
|- | |||
|Low-Reynolds Coarse||—||9.3 × 10<sup>5</sup> | |||
|1.13 × 10<sup>6</sup>||1.35 × 10<sup>6</sup>||3.41 × 10<sup>6</sup> | |||
|- | |||
|Low-Reynolds Fine||—||9.3 × 10<sup>5</sup> | |||
|1.13 × 10<sup>6</sup>||2.66 × 10<sup>6</sup>||4.72 × 10<sup>6</sup> | |||
|} | |||
ALE & Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian\\ | ALE & Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian\\ | ||
aTDC & after top dead center\\ | aTDC & after top dead center\\ |
Revision as of 13:33, 9 October 2018
Internal combustion engine flows for motored operation
Application Challenge AC2-10 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024
Abbreviations
Mesh | Strut | Guide vane | Runner | Draft tube | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-Reynolds Coarse | 3 × 105 | 7 × 105 | 7.6 × 105 | 1 × 106 | 2.76 × 106 |
High-Reynolds Fine | 3 × 105 | 8 × 105 | 1.1 × 106 | 2.85 × 106 | 5.05 × 106 |
Low-Reynolds Coarse | — | 9.3 × 105 | 1.13 × 106 | 1.35 × 106 | 3.41 × 106 |
Low-Reynolds Fine | — | 9.3 × 105 | 1.13 × 106 | 2.66 × 106 | 4.72 × 106 |
ALE & Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian\\
aTDC & after top dead center\\
bTDC & before top dead center\\
BDC & bottom dead center\\
CA & crank angle\\
CAD & crank angle degreeCCD charge-coupled device\\
CCV & cycle-to-cycle variation\\
CDS & central differencing scheme\\
CFD & computational fluid dynamics\\
CFL & Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy\\
ENO & Essentially Non-Oscillatory\\
ERG & exhaust-gas-recirculation\\
EVC & exhaust valve closing\\
EVO & exhaust valve opening\\
HS-PIV & hight speed particle image velocimetry\\
IC & internal combustion\\
IVC & intake valve closing\\
IVO & intake valve opening\\
LES & large eddy simulation\\
MRV & magnetic resonance velocimetry\\
PIV & particle image velocimetry\\
POV & field-of-view\\
QSOU & quasi-second-order upwind\\
QUICK & Quadratic Upwind Interpolation for Convective Kinematics\\
RANS & Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes\\
RMS & root mean square\\
RPM & rounds per minute\\
SAS & scale-adaptive simulation\\
SRS & scale-resolving simulation\\
SST & shear stress transport\\
TDC & top dead center\\
TUBF & Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg\\
TUD & Technische Universität Darmstadt\\
TVD & total variation diminishing\\
UDE & Universität Duisburg-Essen\\
URANS & unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes\\
WG & wall-guided\\
Introduction
The TU Darmstadt engine is an optically accessible single cylinder spark-ignition direct injection engine. It is embedded in an especially designed test bench to provide well characterized boundary conditions and reproducible engine operation. A reproducible engine operation is needed to characterize the variety of in-cylinder processes and is a prerequisite for any comparison of experiments and simulations. The in-cylinder processes are characterized using advanced laser-diagnostics to provide measurements at high spatial and temporal resolutions. The aim of this effort is, to build up a comprehensive data set
- to give insights into the underlying physics for a better understanding of the relevant in-cylinder processes and
- for the validation of CFD simulations especially for large eddy simulations (LES).
blah
Contributed by: Carl Philip Ding,Rene Honza, Elias Baum, Andreas Dreizler — Fachgebiet Reaktive Strömungen und Messtechnik (RSM),Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Brian Peterson — School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Contributed by: Chao He , Wibke Leudesdorff, Guido Kuenne, Benjamin Böhm, Amsini Sadiki, Johannes Janicka — Fachgebiet Energie und Kraftwerkstechnik (EKT), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Peter Janas, Andreas Kempf — Institut für Verbrennung und Gasdynamik (IVG), Lehrstuhl für Fluiddynamik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Contributed by: Stefan Buhl, Christian Hasse — Fachgebiet Simulation reaktiver Thermo-Fluid Systeme (STFS), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany; former: Professur Numerische Thermofluiddynamik (NTFD), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2018