UFR 3-32 Evaluation: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
capable of capturing most of the finest turbulent structures  present  in  a
capable of capturing most of the finest turbulent structures  present  in  a
supersonic boundary layer.
supersonic boundary layer.
Quantitative comparisons in the symmetry plane are shown in Figure  6.
The agreement  between  experiment  and  simulation  is  very  good  in  the
symmetry plane for  the  longitudinal  velocity  except  in  the  separation
bubble region. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that this region  is
very  sensitive  to  the  nature  of  inflow  perturbations  since  a  large
variability of the results in this area has already  been  observed  in  the
experiment, the 2006 data differing from the 2007 one, specifically in  this
region. The agreement with the experiment  is  also  generally  satisfactory
for the Reynolds shear stress.
<br/>
<br/>
----
----

Revision as of 09:08, 12 August 2013

Planar shock-wave boundary-layer interaction

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Semi-confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 3-32

Evaluation

Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments

LES versus experiment at shock generator angle of 8 degrees

Velocity fluctuations in a plane parallel to the wall evidence the presence of low and high velocity streaks that populates canonical boundary layers. After the separation (identified by the first dashed line), the size of turbulent structures in the spanwise direction significantly increases and further downstream the turbulence slowly relaxes toward its canonical state. This figure illustrates the fact that the simulation is capable of capturing most of the finest turbulent structures present in a supersonic boundary layer.

Quantitative comparisons in the symmetry plane are shown in Figure 6. The agreement between experiment and simulation is very good in the symmetry plane for the longitudinal velocity except in the separation bubble region. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that this region is very sensitive to the nature of inflow perturbations since a large variability of the results in this area has already been observed in the experiment, the 2006 data differing from the 2007 one, specifically in this region. The agreement with the experiment is also generally satisfactory for the Reynolds shear stress.




Contributed by: Jean-Paul Dussauge — Orange

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024