UFR 3-34 Test Case: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
= Test Case =
= Test Case =
==Brief description of the study test case==
==Brief description of the study test case==
A 3D sketch of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The configuration presents a GlauertGoldschmied type body consisting of a relatively long fore body and a relatively short concave
ramp comprising the aft part of the model mounted between two glass endplate frames with both
leading edge and trailing edges faired smoothly with a wind tunnel splitter plate.
<div id="figure1"></div>
{|align="center"
|[[Image:UFR3-34_Fig1.png|632px]]
|-
|align="center"|'''Figure 1:''' 3D sketch of experimental setup&nbsp;[&#8204;[[UFR_3-34_References#1|1]]],&nbsp;[&#8204;[[UFR_3-34_References#2|2]]]
|}
Major geometric and flow parameters of the TC are presented in Fig.2 and summarized in
Table 1 (note that in the “baseline” experiment considered here the slot shown in Fig.2 was
closed).
<div id="figure2"></div>
{|align="center"
|[[Image:UFR3-34_Fig2.png|613px]]
|-
|align="center"|'''Figure 2:''' Schematic of TC geometry of the flow parameters
|}
Table 1: Major geometrical and flow parameters
Parameter
Notation
Value
Free stream velocity
U
34.6 m/s
Hump chord
c
0.42 m
Crest height
h
0.0537 m
Reynolds number
Re=Uc/ν
936, 000
Mach number
M
0.1
The experimental data are available at http://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html
(Case 3), at https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html, and also enter the ERCOFTAC
�Classic Collection http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ercoftac under number C.83. The data set
includes: streamwise distributions of the surface pressure and skin-friction coefficients, C P and
C f , and mean velocity and Reynolds stresses fields in the tunnel center-plane, roughly covering
the region 0.63 < x/c < 1.39.
<br/>
<br/>
----
----

Revision as of 11:20, 6 March 2018

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Semi-Confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 3-34

Test Case

Brief description of the study test case

A 3D sketch of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The configuration presents a GlauertGoldschmied type body consisting of a relatively long fore body and a relatively short concave ramp comprising the aft part of the model mounted between two glass endplate frames with both leading edge and trailing edges faired smoothly with a wind tunnel splitter plate.

UFR3-34 Fig1.png
Figure 1: 3D sketch of experimental setup [‌1], [‌2]

Major geometric and flow parameters of the TC are presented in Fig.2 and summarized in Table 1 (note that in the “baseline” experiment considered here the slot shown in Fig.2 was closed).

UFR3-34 Fig2.png
Figure 2: Schematic of TC geometry of the flow parameters


Table 1: Major geometrical and flow parameters Parameter

Notation

Value

Free stream velocity

U

34.6 m/s

Hump chord

c

0.42 m

Crest height

h

0.0537 m

Reynolds number

Re=Uc/ν

936, 000

Mach number

M

0.1

The experimental data are available at http://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html (Case 3), at https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html, and also enter the ERCOFTAC

�Classic Collection http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ercoftac under number C.83. The data set includes: streamwise distributions of the surface pressure and skin-friction coefficients, C P and C f , and mean velocity and Reynolds stresses fields in the tunnel center-plane, roughly covering the region 0.63 < x/c < 1.39.




Contributed by: E. Guseva, M. Strelets — Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024